<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Substack on scarbrough.co.uk</title>
    <link>/tags/substack/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Substack on scarbrough.co.uk</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/tags/substack/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>A Defence of Substack</title>
      <link>/post/defence-of-substack/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/post/defence-of-substack/</guid>
      <description>Initially I thought Wired&amp;rsquo;s article &amp;lsquo;Substack Is Now a Playground for the Deplatformed&amp;rsquo; was going to be another hit piece at a non-mainstream platform that happens to be less moderated than social media. It poses instead the question &amp;lsquo;The company’s CEO says the old way of social media is broken—but is his alternative much different?&amp;rsquo;&#xA;This is actually a good question, and I think the answer is yes - Substack is demonstrably better than social media for articulating one&amp;rsquo;s ideas and opinions.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
